Site icon Saptakala Real Estate Law Journal

TG RERA Orders Apoorva Infra to Refund with Interest for Project Delay and Lapsed Registration

Refund for Delayed Possession

In a strong reaffirmation of homebuyer rights under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the Telangana State Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TG RERA) has directed Apoorva Infra to refund ₹4.35 lakh along with 10.70% annual interest to an allottee after finding serious lapses in project execution and regulatory compliance.

The Authority held that failure to complete the project within the promised timeline, coupled with the lapse of RERA registration, entitled the buyer to exit the project and seek a full refund with interest.

The Case

The complainant, D. Shivannageshwar Rao from Suryapet district, had booked an open plot in Swaminarayana Eco Township, a project promoted by Apoorva Infra. On June 9, 2022, he paid ₹4.35 lakh, approximately 25% of the total consideration of ₹17.41 lakh.

Despite the payment, the project allegedly saw no basic development, including:

Further, plot registrations were stalled due to disputes between the developer and landowners.

Dishonoured Cheque and Refund Dispute

After repeated requests for a refund, Apoorva Infra issued a cheque for ₹4.35 lakh, which was later dishonoured due to insufficient funds.

The developer claimed the cheque was merely a “security instrument”, while the complainant asserted it was issued specifically towards refund, a claim backed by WhatsApp communications placed on record.

TG RERA observed that issuing a cheque for the exact amount received, without any contemporaneous clarification, undermined the promoter’s defence that it was only a security cheque.

Developer’s Defence Rejected

Apoorva Infra argued that:

However, TG RERA rejected these contentions, noting that:

Buyer’s Right to Exit Clearly Upheld

Reiterating Section 18(1) of the RERA Act, TG RERA held that an allottee has an absolute right to withdraw from a project and seek refund with interest if possession is not delivered within the agreed timeline.

The Authority emphasized that a buyer cannot be compelled to wait indefinitely in the absence of revised timelines, supplementary agreements, or credible assurances of completion.

Final Directions Issued by TG RERA

TG RERA directed Apoorva Infra to:

The Authority further warned that any violation would attract penalties under Section 63 of the RERA Act, reinforcing strict regulatory oversight.

Exit mobile version