Saptakala Real Estate Law Journal

Informative Articles

Judgements
High Court Articles Maharashtra REAL Estate Real Estate News RERA

Bombay High Court Judgment on MRTP Act Amendment: Retrospective Application Clarified

May 24, 2024 #Amendment, #Bombay High Court, #development charges, #judgment, #MRTP Act, #retrospective application
Bombay High Court Ruling: Co-Promoter Liable to Pay Refund if Flat Delayed
Share this
You need to be logged in to view this content. Please . Not a Member? Join Us

Related Post

Land Mark Judgements Legal Real Estate News RERA

#MREAT: If the allottees are not the responsible for the reasons for delay, they are entitled to reliefs under Section 18 of #RERA Act and cannot be saddled with consequences for delay in completing project. #Limitation does not apply to real estate booking.

Delhi Real Estate News RERA

Delhi RERA to Mandate Real Estate Advertising Based on Carpet Area

Land Mark Judgements Real Estate News RERA

Parties cannot be compelled to settle their differences through conciliation: MREAT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You missed

Land Mark Judgements Legal Real Estate News RERA

#MREAT: If the allottees are not the responsible for the reasons for delay, they are entitled to reliefs under Section 18 of #RERA Act and cannot be saddled with consequences for delay in completing project. #Limitation does not apply to real estate booking.

Delhi Real Estate News RERA

Delhi RERA to Mandate Real Estate Advertising Based on Carpet Area

Land Mark Judgements Real Estate News RERA

Parties cannot be compelled to settle their differences through conciliation: MREAT

REAL Estate Real Estate News RERA Society Supreme Court Articles

Implications of Civil Appeal No. 2025 on Stamp Duty Refund Claims in Maharashtra