Saptakala Real Estate Law Journal

Informative Articles

Judgements
High Court Articles

Bombay High Court on Maharashtra’s Cabinet Deficiency: “What purpose does passing orders serve? A Minister is required to implement”

Aug 6, 2022 ##News, #Bombay High Court, #High Court, #Law Articles
Bombay High Court Ruling: Co-Promoter Liable to Pay Refund if Flat Delayed
Share this
You need to be logged in to view this content. Please . Not a Member? Join Us

Related Post

High Court Articles Legal REAL Estate Real Estate News RERA

High Court Judgment on SARFAESI Auctions: Stamp Duty Guidelines

High Court Articles Land Mark Judgements REAL Estate Real Estate News RERA

Bombay High Court Rules on Airbnb in Housing Societies & BMC Regulations

High Court Articles REAL Estate Real Estate News Redevelopment Supreme Court Articles

Supreme Court Upholds Bombay HC Ruling on Slum Redevelopment Consent

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You missed

Land Mark Judgements Legal Real Estate News RERA

#MREAT: If the allottees are not the responsible for the reasons for delay, they are entitled to reliefs under Section 18 of #RERA Act and cannot be saddled with consequences for delay in completing project. #Limitation does not apply to real estate booking.

Delhi Real Estate News RERA

Delhi RERA to Mandate Real Estate Advertising Based on Carpet Area

Land Mark Judgements Real Estate News RERA

Parties cannot be compelled to settle their differences through conciliation: MREAT

REAL Estate Real Estate News RERA Society Supreme Court Articles

Implications of Civil Appeal No. 2025 on Stamp Duty Refund Claims in Maharashtra