By Vimal Punmiya
Q.1. Is pagdi official now?
Ans: Yes. The Maharashtra Rent Control Act,1999 has legalised the receiving of any payment of pagdi.
Q.2. Was it legal then in 1960?
Ans: As per Bombay Rent Act, it was illegal to take as well as pay pagdi. However, as per Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, pagdi has become legal.
Q.3. If it was not official then what is the cost of purchase for the tenant? Is it Nil? [Since no document can support the transaction of pagdi]
Ans: If money is not paid officially then cost of acquisition will be taken as nil. However, in case some amount has been paid officially, then ofcourse, he can claim the cost of acquisition along with indexation.
Q.4. Is he liabile for capital gains tax at all?
Ans: After 1994, the amount received on surrender of tenancy is subject to capital gains tax depending upon the holding period. If the tenancy period is less than three years then the capital gains shall be short term capital gains and shall form a part of the total income of the assessee. However, if the tenancy period is more than three years then the same shall be treated as long term capital gains and shall form a part of the total income thereto subject to deductions under section 54EC, 54F etc.
Section 54EC: The assessee can invest an amount upto Rs.50 lakhs in NHAI / RECL Bonds within 6 months from date of transfer of tenancy rights. Such investment amount [upto Rs. 50 lakhs] can be claimed as an exemption under Section 54EC of the IT Act, 1961. However, the interest earned on such bonds thereafter, which may range between 6% p.a. to 7% p.a. is taxable.
Section 54F : Assessee can invest in purchase of a residential house property within one year before or two years after the date of transfer of tenancy rights or contruct a residential house property within three years from the date of such transfer of tenancy rights or he can purchase from a builder, an under-construction property before the receipot of the occupation certficate by the builder and the individual must also receive possession of the same within three years. However, the assessee must not own more than one residential house other than the new asset [in which investment is made] on the date of transfer. Also, the assessee cannot, within a period of three years after the date of transfer, tranfer the new residential house property and cant purchase any other residential house property for a further period of two years from the date of possession of the new house.
If the entire sales proceeds is not invested in the new house property, then the exemption under Section 54F shall be allowed on pro-rata basis as under:
Amount of Investment x Capital Gains
Net Consideration
If the entire amount of sales proceeds is not invested in the purchase or construction of the residential house property before the due date of filing of return of income under section 139(1), then the amount of capital gain or the net consideration as the case may be, is required to be deposited in an account under Capital Gains Account Scheme. The relevant points are :
The deposit shall be made before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) or before furnishing the return of income, whichever is earlier
The deposit shall be made in an account with a bank or institution approved for the purpose i.e. Nationalised bank.
The return of income shall be accompanied by proof of such deposit.
The amount deposited can be withdrawn for utilisation in accordance with the scheme, for the specified purpose.
If the amount deposited is not utilised for acquiring the new asset within the period stipulated, the capital gain related to the unutilised amount shall be treated as the capital gain of the previous year in which the period specified in the above provision expires. However, the CBDT has clarified vide Circular No.743 dated 06.05.1996 that in case of an individual who dies before the expiry of the stipulated period, any unutilised amount of deposit made under capital gains account scheme shall not be chargeable to tax in the hands of the legal heirs of the deceased. This is because the unutilised amount of deposit does not partake the character of income in the hands of the said legal heirs but only a part of the estate devolving upon him.
Q.5. If yes, then indexation should be considered of the year 1980-1981 ?
Ans: If there is no cost, there is neither question of indexation nor substitution of fair market value as on 01.04.1981.
If the cost exists then fair market value as on 01.04.1981 as well as indexation thereon will be allowed and the balance shall be taxable.
Q.6. Should it be the year when the agreement was signed? When he gave up his room of 200 sq.ft and gained a committment of 300 sq.ft. ?
Ans: Capital gain liability will arise on date of handing over possession of 200 sq.ft.
Q.7. He intends to stay in the new house, still he is liable to pay capital gains tax?
Ans: If the new house is purchased as per the provisions of Section 54F, then the assessee is not liable to pay capital gains tax.
Q.8.How much and on what basis?
Ans: Liabiltiy of capital gains tax would arise on the unutilised amount at the tax rate of 20.60%.
Q.9. Suppose he decides to sell off the new premises in the year 2014, then which is the year of capital gain? The year of agreement or the year of sale?
Ans: If the amount is invested under section 54F then the assessee will be liable to pay the tax at the time of sale of sale of new property as provided under Section 54F(3):
“Where the new asset is transferred within a period of three years from the date of its purchase or, as the case may be, its construction, the amount of capital gain arising from the transfer of the original asset not charged under section 45 on the basis of the cost of such new asset as provided in clause (a) or, as the case may be, clause (b), of sub-section (1) shall be deemed to be income chargeable under the head “Capital gains” relating to long-term capital assets of the previous year in which such new asset is transferred.”
Q.10. By any chance, he has to pay capital gains twice?
Ans: Capital gains tax is not payable twice. No single income can be taxed twice. At first when the exemption is claimed, no capital gains tax is payable.
Section 54 F (2) reads as under:
“Where the assessee purchases, within the period of [two years] after the date of the transfer of the original asset, or constructs, within the period of three years after such date, any residential house, the income from which is chargeable under the head “Income from house property”, other than the new asset, the amount of capital gain arising from the transfer of the original asset not charged under section 45 on the basis of the cost of such new asset as provided in clause (a), or, as the case may be, clause (b), of sub-section (1), shall be deemed to be income chargeable under the head “Capital gains” relating to long-term capital assets of the previous year in which such residential house is purchased or constructed.”
Hence, the re-taxability of capital gains is framed as under:
Retaxability: | Section 54F of the IT Act, 1961 | |
Situation 1: Due to short-utilisation/ non-utilisation/ misutilisation of Capital Gain Account Deposit | ||
Mis-utilised/ short-utilised amount is taxable on expiry of the investment period | ||
Situation 2: Due to transfer of new asset within lock-in period | ||
Re-taxability of originally exempted capital gains : | Taxable as LTCG | |
Re-taxability on gain arising on sale of new asset: | Full value of consideration less adjusted cost
[STCG] |
|
Situation 3: Re-taxability due to purchase/ construction of more than one house property | ||
The exemption claimed by the assessee shall become re-taxable as long term capital gain | ||
Q.11. How do you justify the income tax department?
Ans: In case of transfer of premises and pruchase/ constuction of the new residential house property, the following points should be kept in mind which will help justify the exemption under section 54EC/ 54F to the income tax department:
Ensure that the purchase is made within a period of one year before or two years after the date of transfer. The purchase deed would serve as evidence.
Construction of the new residential house property should be completed within 3 years from the date of transfer. Completion certificate, occupation certificate etc would serve the purpose.
If the purchase is made from a builder then it must take place while the house is under construction. Moreover, the occupation certificate by the builder must be received after such purchase is made. Nevertheless, it must be received within three years from the date of transfer of the original asset.
The amount of investment not utilised before the due date of filing return of income under section 139(1) must be invested in capital gain account. The bank statements would serve as good evidence.
Incase of substitution of fair market value as on 01.04.1981, the registered valuer’s report must be obtained.
One room was in my father’s name. I paid Rs.25,000/- for one more attached room 1976, of course I have no proof. My parents and brothers continued to stay there. By 2014, one by one all of them have expired. Now myself and my two niece want to sell the tenancy rights and split it as 1/2, 1/4 and 1/4. We hopte to get abot 40 lacs, 16 lacs will be taken by the owner, and we get them as 12 lacs, 6 lacs and 6 lacs. How do I decide my tax liability. I suppose, if I take the payment by cheque, I will have to treat the entire amount as capital gains from properties. Am I correct. Do I need to take any extra precautions to ensure that no body can harass me on any issue. Thanks.
I have been a tenant since 1961 in a flat in Mumbai. The landlord wants back the property and is willing to pay me goodwill. What is the tax treatment for this amount. What are my options.
Surrender of tenancy right is taxable as long term capital gain. You can purchase another property self occupied or invest in Bonds eligible for such exemptions.
My shop is on rent since last 72 years in Bhavnagar (Gujarat, India),my landlord has sold his entire building (including my shop) to a builder. Now my builder wants me to leave the shop. I just wanted to ask what to do in this situation? Should I ask them to built me a new shop in the same premises? or pay me goodwill? What amount should I get as a goodwill? Are there any other options?? Please help…
my mothers age is 86 yrs she is the tenant in room of 150 sq.fts in paGHDISYSTEM IN SOUTH MUMBAI SHE WANTS TO TRANSFER HER TENANCY TO ME BUT LANLORD IS REFUSING TO DO SO IF SHE TRANSFER TENANCY TO THIRD PARTIES THEN HOW MUCH STAMP DUTY TO BE PAID AND I AM NOT STAYING MOTHER AND AFTER HER DEATH WHO CAN CLAIM TENANCY RIGHTS