Rent in a Redevelopment Project is not taxable: ITAT Mumbai
By Staff Reporter IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI KULDIP SINGH, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER…
Respondents Ordered to Comply with MahaRERA Orders or Pay Penalty
This is the brief of a common order for 3 separate complaints, namely, Mr. Parag Mangaldas Khatri and Mrs. Varsha…
Force Majeure Not Acceptable, Refund with Interest
This brief explains a common order for 4 separate complaints, namely, Yogesh Saraf vs. Mateshwari Altura (Complaint No. CC006000000193052), and…
Flat Already Sold to Third Party, Complainant Is Not Aggrieved Party Under Section 31
This brief explains two separate complaints with a common order, Vikas Agarwal and Alpa Vikas Agarwal vs. M/s. Taksha Spaces…
No Delay Interest After OC Received
This is a brief of a common judgement of 2 separate complaints, namely, Ms. Priyanka Wilson Fernandes and Mr. Anand…
Force Majeure Allowed, Interest Awarded.
This brief explains the common order for 2 separate complaints, namely, Mrs. Rita Anil Parmar and Mr. Anil Ratilal Parmar…
MahaRERA Order: Society as Promoter Must Handover Possession to Allottees
In a common order of 5 separate complainants, namely, Bhavna Ashvin Jhaveri (Complaint No. CC006000000089992), Ashvin Hirendra Jhaveri (Complaint No.…
Non-payment of demand no grounds for denial of refund, says MahaRERA
This brief explains a common order for 2 separate complaints, namely, Suresh Balu Kale and Supriya Suresh Kale (Complaint No.…
RERA is Not Forum for Account Verifications Between Parties
This brief explains a common order for 7 separate complaints by a common complainant, namely, Cupid Construction LLP (Complaint No.…
Refund the Amount but No Documents are Produced for Mental Agony
This brief explains a common order for 11 separate complaints, against a common respondent, Glomore Constructions. The complainants above named…